submitted by /u/briandfoy [link] [comments] |
- YouTube
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.www.youtube.com
I read the man page and I tried searching, but either my search skills have significantly deteriorated or search engines have, because I have trouble now finding any technical answers on google/etc regardless of the question.
With MakeMaker, one can set the CFLAGS with OPTIMIZE="whatever"
as an environmental variable when running perl Makefile.PL
It then gets put in the generated Makefile
With perl Build.PL
which does not use make
I can not figure out how to do the equivalent.
It must be simple, I just can't find it.
Thank you for suggestions.
submitted by /u/AnymooseProphet
[link] [comments]
submitted by /u/briandfoy [link] [comments] |
Randal Schwartz: Half My Life with Perl
As part of year 25 of The Perl Advent Calendar, Perl luminary and co-author of O’Reilly’s “Learning Perl” Randal Schwartz will be giving a presentation entitled "Half My Life with Perl". Randal says: This event will be a live stream via Zoom.lu.ma
I decided to open an account here after seeing so many posts, all with the same characteristics:
- Corinna is great
- It will happen
- This post is at least 3 years old
What’s going on? Why is implementation so slow? What can be done to help?
I see many discussions and many people holding things back with condescending arguments and fear of change. It’s clear (and if it’s not clear to the kind reader, then I think there’s a problem with you) that Perl is in trouble and dying from a lack of new developers. One of the main reasons is the absence of a decent object system, and a native one, not a module.
So much has been said about Corinna, so much work has been done, and yes, it’s great as it is, but it’s experimental. Over the past year, we’ve gained what — new writers? Where’s everything that was planned? Destruct blocks, custom constructors, custom readers and writers, :common, etc.
To make it popular, we need it. We need more people using it, and for that, we need it in the language — not as an experimental feature. So much time has been invested in decision-making, but no language is perfect. We just need it. It doesn’t have to be perfect.
submitted by /u/RegexSorcerer
[link] [comments]