Very configurable Markdown processor written in pure Perl, supporting the CommonMark spec and many extensions
Changes for 1.01 - 2024-04-05
- Deactivate the support for setext headings in pmarkdown default syntax.
- Remove a copy of the input Markdown when using the functional interface.
- Bugfixes:
Provides generalized and structured configuration value access
Changes for 3.01 - 2024-04-05T12:32:18-05:00
- declare correct min perl version
- provide more/better exaples in SYNOPSIS docs
mysqld runner for tests
Changes for 1.0020 - 2024-04-05T16:35:54Z
- introduce GitHub Actions for CI
- Use UNIX socket authentication with MariaDB 10.4.3
- ignore-db-dir on MySQL 5.7 only
- Don't loop endlessly if mysqld fails to start
- Replace which with command -v for POSIX-compliant
- fix Test 05-copy-data-from.t Fails
Greetings monks, question about reorganizing a Perl module, and if the following is a good approach:
The module is 7300 lines in one file and has 106 subs. I'll call it Cat.pm, its mostly called as an object like Cat->new(); but could be called like Cat->black() or Cat::Black::meow
To simplify maintaining this file I am thinking I can make a new sub directory in the same folder as the file call it Cat/ and move the 105 of the 106 subs to about 12 or 15 new .pm's in the new folder.
I plan later to rewrite one or more of those as XS modules. Cat/Tabby_XS.pm etc.
Then in Cat.pm I would just have use Cat::Black; use Cat::White; use Cat:;tabby; ...etc in Cat.pm
The only sub I'd keep in Cat.pm is sub new which looks like this:
sub new { #Object Interface #http://www.perl.com/pub/1999/09/refererents.html my $type = shift; my $self = {}; $self->{dbh} = shift; bless $self, $type; $self; }
I have a book on cleaning up old perl code but it is now a very old book LOL, will moving the subroutines to new files break old code that depends on Cat.pm? TIA
submitted by /u/bug_splat
[link] [comments]