Skip to main content


Content warning: Politics

in reply to Curtis "Ovid" Poe (he/him)

Content warning: Politics

#1
in reply to Curtis "Ovid" Poe (he/him)

Content warning: Politics

in reply to Curtis "Ovid" Poe (he/him)

direct democracy where a panel is selected at random and makes plans based on evidence can eliminate commercial corruption and produce sane policy. Direct vote per issue is vulnerable as you say and people will happily vote to cut taxes and increase spending at the same time.

Hitler knew he could destroy democracy from the inside and Trump and Johnson have followed the same path...

in reply to Adam Trickett :debian: :kde:

@drajt How is that "random selection" performed? That also sounds like a recipe for disaster because it skips the first problem (board room control) but ignores the second one: people having a narrow vision of what they want so they write a bad law that doesn't take edge cases or big picture into account. This has hurt Oregon in the past.
in reply to Curtis "Ovid" Poe (he/him)

random like a jury is random. The main vulnerability is the civil service which supports them, as it can guide them by controlling the flow of information. When Macron tried citizen panels for the climate issue the recommendations were basically sound and progressive, and not the right wing corporate rubbish he was expecting. So they have basically been ignored.

By controlling the flow of information you can get any decision you want, Hitler, Trump, Johnson, Brexit, were voted for!